實體隱喻視野中的老子之“道”

道学研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 34-45.

實體隱喻視野中的老子之“道”

鄧曉淩^*

出版日期:2020-12-10 发布日期:2021-08-19
通讯作者: *鄧曉淩,四川大學道教與宗教文化研究所宗教學博士研究生,四川大學外國語學院講師,研究方向:中國道教與認知語言學。通信地址:四川省成都市武侯區一環路南一段24號四川大學文科樓,郵編: 610064。電子郵箱: ddboy8@163.com。

Lao Zi's Dao from an Ontological Metaphoric Perspective

Deng Xiaoling

Online:2020-12-10 Published:2021-08-19
About author:Deng Xiaoling, PhD candidate, Institute of Taoism and Religious Culture Sichuan University, Lecturer, College of Foreign Language and Cultures in Sichuan University; Address: Institute of Taoism and Religious Culture, Sichuan University, No. 24 South Section 1, Yihuan Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; Postcode: 610064; Email: ddboy8@163.com.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文從認知隱喻的角度分析老子“道”概念的構建過程。老子稱“道大”“不肖”,否認道與經驗世界的相似性,認為道既非經驗能描述,也非實體可比擬。然而事實可能與此剛好相反,基於人類經驗所產生的概念隱喻是概念化形而.上之. “道”的必由之路。實體隱喻作為一類重要的概念隱喻,對於形而.上概念的理解和定義具有極其重要的作用。在概念化“道”的過程中,實體隱喻不是一種選擇,而是一種必然;; 實體經驗在老子隱喻性思維中的作用,既不可避免,也不能否認。

关键词: 老子, 道, 實體隱喻, 概念隱喻

Abstract: It is a new academic attempt to analyze the construction process of Lao Zi's concept of "Dao" from the perspective of cognitive metaphor. Lao Zi called “Dao” is so “big” that it's unlike anything, denying the similarity between “Dao” and the world of experience, which is to say that Dao can neither be described by experience nor comparable in substance. However, the fact maybe just the opposite. The conceptual metaphor on human experience is inevitable in conceptualizing the metaphysical “Dao”. Ontological metaphor, one of the most important and fundamental in all conceptual metaphors, plays an important role in the understanding and definition of metaphysical concepts. In conceptualizing the metaphysical “Dao”, ontological metaphor is not a choice but a must and human experience on the entity is neither avoidable nor deniable in Lao Zi' metaphorical thinking.

Key words: Dao, Ontological metaphor, Conceptual metaphor

鄧曉淩. 實體隱喻視野中的老子之“道”[J]. 道学研究, 2020(2): 34-45.

Deng Xiaoling. Lao Zi's Dao from an Ontological Metaphoric Perspective[J]. Daoism Studies, 2020(2): 34-45.

参考文献

(一)傳統文獻
《道藏》[The Daoist Canon] (北京[Beijing]:文物出版社[Cultural Relics Press],上海[Shanghai]:上海書店[Shanghai Bookstore Publishing House],天津[Tianjin]:天津古籍出版社[Tianjin Ancient Works Publishing House],1988),第 18冊[vol.18].
[漢]許慎Xu Shen撰,段玉裁Duan Yucai注,《說文解字注》[Shuowen jiezi zhu],(鄭州[Zhengzhou]:中州古籍出版社[Zhongzhou Ancient Works Publishing House], 2006)
[清]阮元Ruan Yuan校刻,《十三經注疏.周易正義》[Shisanjing zhushu . zhouyi zhengyi] (北京Beijing]:中華書局[Zhonghua Book Company], 1980)
《太清金液神丹經》[Taiqing Jinye Shendanjing],(卷.上) [vol.1],《道藏》[The Daoist Canon] (北京[Beijing]:文物出版社[Cultural Relics Press],上海[Shanghai]:上海書店[Shanghai Bookstore Publishing House ],天津[Tianjin]:天津古籍出版社[Tianjin Ancient Works Publishing House],1988),第18冊[vol.18].
(二)近人論著
[德]埃利希,諾依曼Erich Neumann, The Great Mother: an Analysis of the Archetype《大母神一原型分析》,李以洪Li Yihong譯(北京[Beijing]:東方出版社[Oriental Publishing House],1998).
陳鼓應Chen Guying著,《老子注譯及評介》[aozi zhuyi ji pingie] (北京Beiing]:中華書局[Zhonghua Book Company], 2009).
陳國符Chen Guofu著,《中國外丹黄白法考》[Zhongguo waidan huagnbaifa kao] (《中國外丹黄白法考》[Zhongguo waidan huagnbaifa kao] (上海[Shanghai]:上海古籍出版社[Shanghai Classics Publishing House],1997).
鄧穀泉Deng Guquan,《論“道沖” 之“沖”》[Lun“daochong” zhi “chong” ], 《長沙大學學報》Journal of Changsha University, no. 1(1999): 80-84.
方芳Fang Fang、戚濤Qi Tao合著,《“道”之隱喻與隱喻之“道”—— <道德經> 隱喻機制解讀》[‘Dao zhi yinyu yu yinyu zhidao: Daodejing yinyu jizhi jiedu”], 《學術界》Academics,no. 7(2016): 137-141.
費多益Fei Duoyi著,《寓身認知心理學》[Embodied Cognitive Psychology],(上海[Shanghai]:上海教育出版社[Shanghai Educational Publishing House], 2010)
馮時Feng Shi著,《中國天文考古學》[Zhongguo tianwen kaoguxue] (北京[Beijing]: 社會科學文獻出版社[Social Sciences Academic Press],2001 )
高亨Gao Heng著,《老子注譯》 [Laozi zhuyi],華鍾彦Hua Zhongyan校, (鄭州[Zhengzhou]:河南人民出版社[Henan People’s Publishing House],1980)
高亨Gao Heng著,《周易大傳今注》[Zhouyi dazhuan jinzhu],(濟南Jinan]:齊魯書社[Qilu Press],1979).
胡孚琛Hu Fuchen、呂錫琛Li Xichen合著,《道學通論- -道家、道教、仙學》[Daoxue tonglun: daojia, daojiao, xianxue] (北京[Beijing]:社會科學文獻出版社[Social Sciences Academic Press],1999).
樓宇烈Lou Yulie校釋,《老子道德經注校釋》[Laozi Daodejing zhujiaoshi] (北京[Beiing]:中華書局[Zhonghua Book Company], 2008).
[美]馬麗加,金芭塔斯Marija Gimbutas, The Living Goddesses: Religion in Pre-Patriarchal Europe《活著的女神》,葉舒憲等Ye Shuxian,etc譯 (桂林[Guilin]:廣西師範大學出版社[Guangxi Normal University Press],2008)
[美]喬治.萊考夫George Lakoff、馬克. 詹森Mark Johnson合著, Metaphors We Live by《我們賴以生存的隱喻》,賀文忠He Wenzhong譯(杭州[Hangzhou]:浙江大學出版社[Zhejiang University publishing house], 2015).
任繼愈RenJiyu著,《中華傳世文選.宋文鑒(上)》[Zhonghua chuanshi wenxuan:Song wenjian],.上[vol. 1] (長春[Changchun]:吉林人民出版社Jjilin People' s Publishing House], 1998).
唐君毅TangJunyi著,《老子言道之六義》[Laozi yandao zhi liuyi],《國學大師說老莊及道家》[Guoxue dashi shuo laozhuang ji daojia], (昆明[Kunming]:雲南人民出版社[Yunan People’s Publishing House],2009),39.
王明Wang Ming著,《太平經合校》[Taipingjing hejiao ] (北京[Beijing:中華書局[Zhonghua Book Company],1979).
楊潤根Yang Rungen著,《發現老子》[Faxian laozi] (北京[Beijing]:華夏出版社Huaxia Publishing House],2003)
Lakoff, George, The Contemporary Theory of metaphor, in Metaphor and Thought, 2nd. ed, ed. A. Ottony(Cambridge: Cambridge University of Chicago Press, 1980), 244.

[1]	郭佳興, 胡銳. “馬禮遜藏書”中的涉道文獻^*[J]. 道学研究, 2021, 37(1): 1-12.
[2]	柴洪源. 《大道家令戒》中道氣觀與其成書年代的關係[J]. 道学研究, 2021, 37(1): 54-64.
[3]	袁玉梅. 道敎南宗四祖陳楠生平記載淺析[J]. 道学研究, 2021, 37(1): 78-86.
[4]	張軍龍. 張宇初鬼神觀念論析^*[J]. 道学研究, 2021, 37(1): 87-97.
[5]	羅禧. 論道敎對子平術的“融攝”與“排斥”——以《道藏》中《紫微斗數》《儒門崇理折衷堪輿完孝錄》為中心^*[J]. 道学研究, 2021, 37(1): 110-125.
[6]	張雷. 對道敎與民間信仰之關係及社會功能的再認識[J]. 道学研究, 2021, 37(1): 126-137.
[7]	于國慶, 李霄. 試析道教善書中的“功過量化”思想^*[J]. 道学研究, 2020, 36(2): 25-33.
[8]	林鑾生. 竈王經明本順性思想探究^*[J]. 道学研究, 2020, 36(2): 46-58.
[9]	宛小燕. 道教預防醫學思想初探[J]. 道学研究, 2020, 36(2): 74-89.
[10]	林汝達. 十七世紀日本道教文獻《桃藥編》的成書^*[J]. 道学研究, 2020, 36(2): 100-117.
[11]	葉文學. 大理道教火官信仰述論[J]. 道学研究, 2020, 36(2): 135-155.
[12]	樊兵策. 梁漱溟的道學思想初探^*[J]. 道学研究, 2020, 36(2): 156-169.
[13]	褚國锋. 《長春道教源流》的刊印及其影響[J]. 道学研究, 2020, 35(1): 27-45.
[14]	賀晏然. 《金陵玄觀志》明刊本述略[J]. 道学研究, 2020, 35(1): 46-57.
[15]	詹石窗, 顧宗正. 鹿邑縣城及其太清宫沿革考實^*[J]. 道学研究, 2020, 35(1): 112-136.